One-way to Mars = no way to Mars

The one-way-to-Mars idea has been around a long time, and as someone who ended his book on Mars with a section on the various ways in which making the voyage to that particular "other world" could be seen as chiming with the idea of making the voyage to the undiscover'd country of death I have a sense of why it might appeal. But even when it is championed by someone as smart as my friend Paul Davies, as is the case in today's Guardian, it is still a silly idea. Here are extracts from Paul's article with my comments

I am not talking about a suicide mission. With its protective atmosphere, accessible water and carbon dioxide, and significant amounts of methane, Mars is one of the few places in the solar system that could support a human colony. By eliminating the need to transport heavy fuel and equipment for the return journey, costs could be slashed by 80% or more.

Well you can make do without a return vehicle, sure. At the same time, you have to take or pre-position four years of supplies if you are to keep a straight face about "not talking about a suicide mission" -- two years to take you to the next resupply mission and two years to deal with the possibility that that resupply mission might fail. You have to take either more shelter or more tools for building  shelter. You have to take a long term power supply -- either a lot more photovoltaics than a short-term mission needs or a nuclear reactor. Again, if you are to say "not a suicide mission" with a straight face, back-ups for everything. And you still need to design a wholly new, large capacity entry, descent and landing system, which is a big challenge, and sort out how to stay ready-to-explore healthy on the trip out. The idea that leaving out the return vehicle could in itself reduce costs by 80% seems extremely farfetched -- even more so when your plan includes prepositioning the supplies and food. Why not preposition the return vehicle too, a la Mars Direct? Would that really increase the costs fourfold?

Most importantly, in terms of costs, there's the ongoing commitment. A set of Mars missions you can cancel is a much more attractive proposition than a set of Mars missions that you cannot cancel without killing people ("Launch the next rocket or the kid gets it"). To fund a single one-way-to-Mars mission is more or less to sign up to funding them for as long as the colony lasts. That is a far larger spending commitment than required for a small number of return trips.

(Minor aside: no-one cares more about methane on Mars than I do: but does it really make Mars more habitable?)

After a century or two, the colony could become self-sustaining.

This carries a whiff of the idea that the colonisation is being done by underpants gnomes (not a bad idea: they'd use up fewer expendables), with "profit" in the archetypal UG business plan replaced by "self-sustainability". How and why should we believe that the colony would become self-sustaining? And how much extra investment would that take? It is worth noting that Antarctic colonies, 50 years on, are not self sustaining. And Mars is a lot tougher. Not saying it couldn't be done -- but it doesn't sound cheap. You have to keep resupplying for a century at least, probably at an increasing rate for much of that time. If aiming for self-sustainability were a useful goal in such circumstances, we would be trying to make McMurdo self sustaining. We're not.

And that's before we get to the pregancies. No one at present has any idea of what it might take to carry a child to term under Martian gravity, or whether a non-engineered human can actually do such a thing successfully. That's a pretty big known unknown to sweep under the table. Is the plan for people just to get pregant and see what happens?

A permanent base on Mars would have a number of advantages beyond being a bonanza for planetary science and geology. If, as some evidence suggests, exotic micro-organisms have arisen independently of terrestrial life, studying them could revolutionise biology, medicine and biotechnology.

Yes, it might -- if the colony has the capacity to get them out from the depths at which they probably live (ie heavy-duty mining equipment). But the colony would also fatally compromise any possibility of making the research biologically reversible, which carries a strong environmental penalty over and above the fact that the contamination involved might make all that science a little hard to do.

Mars would also provide an excellent forward base for exploring and mining the asteroid belt, and developing whole new industries.

I accept that arguing from science fiction is not ideal, but bear in mind the early Larry Niven stories in which Mars is an unexplored backwater largely because asteroid miners see no reason to ever descend into a gravity well. If asteroid mining ever makes sense, wouldn't it make most sense to target near-earth asteroids, of which there are plenty, rather than main belt asteroids? (Also, I suspect that in terms of travel time rather than delta v the average main belt asteroid is not that much easier to get to from Mars than from Earth orbit, but I may be wrong)

A self-sustaining Mars colony would serve as a "lifeboat" in the event of a global catastrophe on Earth. In coming centuries, our civilisation faces small but persistent threats from comet and asteroid impacts, world wars, global pandemics and climatic upheavals, any of which could wipe out all humanity.

Really? All humanity? A cataclysm that would mean that the earth-bound survivors were fewer in number than a colony on Mars suggests to me either an extraordinarily thorough-going cataclysm or a really large colony on Mars, and neither of those seems very likely. Certainly seems beyond the power of war or disease, and I'm not sure even Chicxulub could do it (New Zealand flora were not hugely affected by the K/T event). Also note that having detoured through the Mars-as-a-trading-partner idea, we have now returned to the Mars as self-sufficient outpost idea -- a Mars robust enough to have all links severed is a Mars less reliant on earth than the Greenland colonies were on Iceland and Scandinavia. (Also, there's a philosophical point here: if all but a handful are dead, does the continuation of the culture as an idea really matter? Is it that much more than its instantiation? And does the answer to this change if the genocide was self inflicted?)

Perhaps the best motivation for going to Mars is political. It is obvious that no single nation currently has either the will or the resources to do it alone, but a consortium of nations and space agencies could achieve it within 20 years. A worldwide project to create a second home for humankind elsewhere in the solar system would be the greatest adventure our species has embarked upon since walking out of Africa 100,000 years ago, and provide a unifying influence unparalleled in history.

Leaving aside that our species didn't walk out of Africa (a few did, a lot stayed), the symbolism here is terrible. While Paul is definite that this would not be a suicide mission, it would involve a great deal of death and a high risk of total failure (especially if being done on the cheap). As Paul says, there will be "reduced life expectancy due to radiation, lack of advanced medical resources" as well as a very high risk environment: as Greg Benford once put it to me "Like the moon, but with worse weather". I was going to write at this point that human sacrifice is not an acceptable instrument of policy, and then realised that of course it is. But in such a blatant form I can't see it flying. The fact that there are plenty of people who might volunteer, as Paul rightly says, does not mean that it would be right to indulge them.

And what if they live? They do so because of unparalleled spending. A world where a select few gets hundreds of millions, at the very least, invested annually merely to keep them alive while equally deserving people die in large numbers for want of far less is not a very attractive place.

Human Mars exploration is indeed a fine goal, and it is quite possible that fairly early on there will be some who elect to stay. But the only real argument for doing it sooner or rather than later is the selfish one of wanting to see/participate in it personally. I can appreciate that, but I don't think it's a compelling policy point. There are a lot of other big exciting projects to inspire us -- a new energy infrastructure for the world, the millennium development goals, in pure science the development of telescopes for characterising the atmospheres and possible biospheres of exoplanets.

There is something poetic about the notion of death on Mars, or of choosing to die there -- Clarke's Transit of Earth caught that nicely. But Liebestod is not a good basis for public policy.

(This post doesn't mark any long term intention to start blogging here again in a serious way; I am in fact somewhat surprised to find myself putting it up, since there has been so much good stuff about Mars I haven't blogged. I guess I felt I had something to say. More frequent, less Martian blogging can now be found over at Heliophage.)

Comments

[Kamagra]

Hey, Really great work,I would like to join your blog anyway so please continue sharing with us.....@

[VimaX]

I am thoroughly convinced in this said post. I am currently searching for ways in which I could enhance my knowledge in this said topic you have posted here. It does help me a lot knowing that you have shared this information here freely. I love the way the people here interact and shared their opinions too. I would love to track your future posts pertaining to the said topic we are able to read.

[Seo Services India]

There are may person searching about that now they will find enough resources by your post,

[Ciprofloxacin causes impotence.]

News on Colchicine tablets. :
Valproic increases concentration of carbamazepine. Known problems with blood medication coreg. Amoxil (amoxicillin) cod cash buy.
Work cited for coreg cr. Enalapril for cats. Carbamazepine and grapefruit. Coreg 25 mg discount Coreg coq10.
Vitamins needed with coreg. Purchase original clomiphene. Uses of estrace cream.
What is cefuroxime axetil. Evista-60mg. Phenobarbital uses vicodin compazine. Ciprofloxacin treatment for tingling penis.
Famvir and shingles. Ciprofloxacin hcl 500 mg taapo. Has anyone had good response from coreg for hypertension. Scleroderma colchicine.
Deltasone hyperglycemia. Ciprofloxacin and brachial plexus. Web dr. Drug diltiazem. Coreg medication.
Carbamazepine level. What is ciprofloxacin used for.
Depression effexor. Ic colchicine.
What is ciprofloxacin hcl taran used for. Coreg cr and coughing. Esomeprazole generic nexium. Side effects of carbamazepine and uterine fibroid.
Taking estrace during pregnancy. Clobetasol proprionate vaginal treatment.

[Generic Viagra]

Excelente información, usted tiene un blog maravilloso y un excelente artículo!!!

[ゼチーア]

Hi there,
Really nice job,There are many people searching about that now they will find enough sources by your tips.
Also looking forward for more tips about that

[Generic viagra]

Skönt att vara besöka din blogg igen, har det varit månader för mig. Väl här artikeln som jag har väntat så länge. Jag behöver den här artikeln för att slutföra mitt uppdrag i kollegiet, och den har samma tema med din artikel. Tack, bra aktie..

[Generic Levothryroxine]

I would like to appreciate the great work done by You

[Generic Viagra]

Es bueno estar visitando su blog de nuevo, se ha pasado meses para mí. Bueno este artículo que he estado esperando durante tanto tiempo..

[Generic Drugs Exporter]

I have wanted to learn more about particular topics, but not many websites would help me out in informing me the way I expected. This left me with many question, but after reading your article, I got an answer to all my questions. You are too cool dude!!!

[Generic Tadalafil]

Dit is echt interessant, Je bent een zeer ervaren blogger. Ik ben bij uw feed en kijk uit naar op zoek naar meer van uw prachtige post. Ook heb ik deelde in je site in mijn sociale netwerken!

[Periactin]

Der er mange person, der søger om, at nu vil de finde nok ressourcer ved din postThis er virkelig interessant, Du er en meget dygtig blogger. Jeg har tilmeldt dit feed og ser frem til at søge mere af din vidunderlige indlæg. Desuden har jeg delt dit websted i mit sociale netværk!

[male enhancement]

This blog really makes me impressed and attractive thanks to this blog I can get more knowledge from previous

[phentermine]

Suicide, talking about the topic reminds me of the fact that most men commit suicide more often than women do, and that is based on actual surveys and world statistics.
http://www.usacapsule.com/phentermine.html

[Baby nursery art]

I shall try as much as possible to enjoy life to the fullest and be satiated with the wonderful things that are around me, which I have been unaware of until now.

[Kamagra Oral Jelly]

I can appreciate that, but I don't think it's a compelling policy point. There are a lot of other big exciting projects to inspire us

[ken anthony]

Things change.

We could begin colonization mars in about four years. It does not even require a national commitment. A single company has already developed the vehicles for all stages of the missions. The first group of several dozen researchers could be fully supplied at a reasonable and sustainable rate while researching ISRU for independent colonists. Once that's done, settlement can begin and financing could be available so that anyone could go... not just the rich.

There is plenty of wealth waiting for them. A single bank could finance the whole project and earn a profit every year of operation because their are plenty of people willing to make mars a new home. Financed properly every person going to mars would become a millionaire the moment they step onto the planet so they would have the resources to be part of the planets economic development.

With the right attitude we could have a colony of over 1000 colonists on mars in less than 50 years. 5000 in a hundred. A million in 200 years.

Or we could just sit here and talk about how impossible it all is.

One dragon could land six person-years of supplies on mars for about $150m. If they can extract just water that would extend to 24 person-years for the same cost. Assuming energy, you can replace oxygen resupply so it's even longer.

Once settlement starts the entire cost is self financed for a profit.

[British Food]

wow great i have read many articles about this topic and everytime i learn something new i dont think it will ever stop always new info , Thanks for all of your hard work!

[emt training]

it may be nice to have a way to go mars for regular folks someday.

[Chassidy]

Thanks for writing such an easy-to-undrsaetnd article on this topic.

[xtremeno]

Thanks for the post! I found this very interesting and informative.

[xtremeno]

Thanks for the post! It is very informative and interesting!

[Paper Napkins]

Mars is the fourth planet from the Sun in the Solar System.Mars has approximately half the radius of Earth.From all of the planets only Mars is right option for the human living.Its climate ,geology, atmosphere, air etc are support for the life of human.

[proyectos culturales]

I like your way of writing, You break it down nicely. Keep these informative post coming! i mean keep posting, much appreciated!... thanks have a great day :)

[xtremeno]

Hello, I like your page. I’m glad Google pointed me to it. I was able to get the know-how I was searching so badly for days now. Thanks for the post! I'll definitely be back. Good luck!